ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Histological Processing of Scaffolds: Challenges and Solutions.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Powered Histopathology in Stem Cell Research: Bridging Morphology, Function, and Omics.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Development of aBioactive materials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scaffolds are widely used in bioengineering, both as 3D native tissue-mimicking models for investigating mechanisms under physiological and pathological conditions and also as implantable agents in regenerative medicine. Histological approaches, mainly formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) and frozen sample sectioning, are commonly applied to evaluate cell distribution and tissue-like properties of scaffolds. However, standard histological processing is not always compatible with the materials that scaffolds are made of. Thus, some adaptations to protocols are required to obtain intact sections. In this review we discuss challenges related to the histological processing of scaffolds and solutions to overcome them. We sequentially cover processing steps of the three main histological techniques for sample preparation-cryomicrotomy, FFPE samples microtomy and vibrating microtomy. Furthermore, we highlight the critical considerations in choosing the most appropriate method based on scaffold composition, mechanical properties and the specific research question. The goal of this review is to provide practical guidance on choosing reliable histological evaluation of complex scaffold-based systems in tissue engineering research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.