Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40863283›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2025

Prevalence and Screening Tools of Intimate Partner Violence Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Laura Brunelli, Flavia Pennisi, Antonio Pinto, Loredana Cella, Maria Parpinel, Silvio Brusaferro, Carlo Signorelli, Vincenzo Baldo, Vincenza Gianfredi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Detecting Patterns of Intimate Partner Violence Using Qualitative Analyses and Machine Learning Algorithms.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Intimate partner violence among pregnant women in Limpopo Province, South Africa.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laura BrunelliDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5475-0021
Flavia PennisiFaculty of Medicine, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-9185-9747
Antonio PintoFaculty of Medicine, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-4315-0481
Loredana CellaDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Maria ParpinelDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1309-4467
Silvio BrusaferroDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1018-7094
Carlo SignorelliFaculty of Medicine, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9710-4962
Vincenzo BaldoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, 35122 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6012-9453
Vincenza GianfrediDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3848-981X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Domestic violence (DV), including intimate partner violence (IPV) during pregnancy and the puerperium, represents a major public health issue, significantly affecting maternal and child health. (2) Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, aimed to identify screening tools used to detect DV and IPV among pregnant and postpartum women and to estimate DV prevalence. The protocol was published in PROSPERO in advance (CRD42023473392). (3) Results: A comprehensive literature search across PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted on 1 January 2024, resulting in 34,720 records; 98 studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies were conducted in over 40 countries, and most were cross-sectional. Commonly used screening tools included the WHO Women's Health and Life Experiences Questionnaire, the Abuse Assessment Screen, and the WHO Violence Against Women Instrument. Meta-analyses showed that 10% of women experienced physical violence, 26% psychological violence, 9% sexual violence, 16% verbal violence, and 13% economic violence. The overall prevalence of IPV during pregnancy and the puerperium was 26%. Despite the widespread use of validated instruments, substantial heterogeneity was observed, underscoring the need for standardization. (4) Conclusion: These findings underline the urgent need to integrate routine IPV screening into maternal care pathways using validated, culturally adapted tools, ensuring women's safety and confidentiality.

Indexed as

domestic violenceintimate partner violencepostpartumpregnancypublic healthscreening toolsviolence against women

Identifiers

PMID40863283
PMCPMC12385551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.