Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40863269›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2025

The Reaction to Diagnosis Questionnaire-Sibling Version: A Preliminary Study on the Psychometric Properties.

Chiara Martis, Annalisa Levante, Flavia Lecciso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chiara MartisDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, University of Salento, Via di Valesio, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-1315-8180
Annalisa LevanteDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, University of Salento, Via di Valesio, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3250-3839
Flavia LeccisoDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, University of Salento, Via di Valesio, 73100 Lecce, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnosis of a disability in a child may significantly impact the entire family system. While existing literature has primarily focused on parental reaction to the diagnosis, little is known about how typically developing siblings process this event.

methodsThis exploratory study presented the preliminary psychometric properties of the Reaction to Diagnosis Questionnaire-Sibling Version, adapted from an instrument originally designed to assess parental reaction to the child's diagnosis. Following a back-translation and adaptation process, a cross-sectional study was conducted on 623 typically developing siblings (

resultsExploratory factor analyses supported a refined 32-item questionnaire with two factors-lack of resolution versus resolution, both showing excellent internal reliability. No significant differences were found based on typically developing sibling sex, age, or type of disability of the brother/sister, while correlational analyses indicated that greater disability severity was associated with lower resolution and higher lack of resolution.

conclusionsResults suggested that the Reaction to Diagnosis Questionnaire-Sibling Version is a promising tool for assessing the reaction to the brother/sister diagnosis on behalf of the typically developing siblings. Further research is needed to confirm these results and inform intervention programs promoting well-being and adaptive family functioning.

Indexed as

disabilityexploratory factor analysisinternal validitymeasureRDQ-Sreaction to the diagnosistypically developing sibling

Identifiers

PMID40863269
PMCPMC12385898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.