Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Giovanni Emanuele CorazzaDEI Department, Marconi Institute for Creativity, University of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6898-4515
Sergio AgnoliDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Via E. Weiss, 2, 34128 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3004-7988
Ana Jorge ArtigauSchool of Communication, Universidad Austral, Mariano Acosta 1611, Pilar B1630FHB, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ronald A BeghettoMary Lou Fulton College for Teaching and Learning Innovation, Arizona State University, 1050 S. Forrest Mall, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Irene ColettoDEI Department, Marconi Institute for Creativity, University of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-7353-331X
Angela FaiellaDEI Department, Marconi Institute for Creativity, University of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2260-0966
Katusha GerardiniResearch Center in Communication Psychology (PsiCom), Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Via Largo Fra Agostino Gemelli, 1, 25123 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-3903-1308
Kenneth GilhoolyPsychology Department, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.
Vlad P GlăveanuDCU Centre for Possibility Studies, Dublin City University, Glasnevin Campus, D09 V209 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-6029-6718
Michael Hanchett HansonDepartment of Human Development, Teachers College, Columbia University, 525 W. 120th Street, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Hansika KapoorDepartment of Psychology, Monk Prayogshala, 4114, C Wing, Oberoi Garden Estates, Near Chandivali Studios, Powai, Mumbai 400072, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0805-7752
James C KaufmanNeag School of Education, University of Connecticut, 2131 Hillside Road, Unit 3007, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0595-2820
Yoed N KenettFaculty of Data and Decision Sciences, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Kiryat Hatechnion, Haifa 3200003, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-3872-7689
Anatoliy V KharkhurinSchool of Psychology, HSE University, 20 Myasnitskaya Street, Moscow 101000, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5970-5003
Simone LuchiniDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, Moore Building, Fischer Road, State College, PA 16801, USA.
Margaret MangionThe Edward de Bono Institute for Creative Thinking and Innovation, University of Malta, MSD2080 Msida, Malta.ORCID 0000-0003-3531-1709
Mario MirabileDEI Department, Marconi Institute for Creativity, University of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-2896-0284
Felix-Kingsley ObialoCentre for Creativity and Entrepreneurial Studies, Dominican University Ibadan, 10, Education Layout, Ibadan 200132, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-6469-2507
Roni Reiter-PalmonDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, 6001 Dodge St., Omaha, NE 68132, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8259-4516
Jeb S PuryearDepartment of Teaching and Learning, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT 59812, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1163-2965
Eleonora Diletta SarcinellaResearch Center in Communication Psychology (PsiCom), Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Via Largo Fra Agostino Gemelli, 1, 25123 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0004-4993-774X
Min TangUniversity Institute of Schaffhausen, Rheinstrasse 10, CH-8200 Schaffhausen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7708-4850
Giulia Maria VavassoriDEI Department, Marconi Institute for Creativity, University of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-1522-6597
Florent VinchonLaPEA, Université Paris Cité and Univ Gustave Eiffel, 71 Avenue Edouard Vaillant, 92100 Boulogne Billancourt, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3443-3683
Indre ViskontasDepartment of Psychology, University of San Francisco, 2130 Fulton Ave., San Francisco, CA 94117, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0875-2103
Selina WeissDepartment of Psychology, University of Hildesheim, Universitätsplatz 1, 31141 Hildesheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8796-2154
Dimitrios ZbainosDepartment of Economics and Sustainable Development, Harokopio University, El. Veinzelou 70, 17676 Athens, Greece.
Todd LubartLaPEA, Université Paris Cité and Univ Gustave Eiffel, 71 Avenue Edouard Vaillant, 92100 Boulogne Billancourt, France.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Creativity is the primary driver of our cultural evolution. The astonishing potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and its possible application in the creative process poses an urgent and dramatic challenge for humanity; how can we maximize the benefits of AI while minimizing the associated risks? In this article, we identify all forms of human-AI collaboration in this realm as cyber-creativity. We introduce the following two forward-looking scenarios: a utopian vision for cyber-creativity, in which AI serves to enhance and not replace human creativity, and a dystopian view associated with the pre-emption of all human creative agency caused by the rise of AI. In our view, the scientific community is called to bring its contribution, however small, to help humanity make steps towards the utopian scenario, while avoiding the dystopian one. Here, we present a decalogue of research challenges identified for this purpose, touching upon the following dimensions: (1) the theoretical framework for cyber-creativity; (2) sociocultural perspectives; (3) the cyber-creative process; (4) the creative agent; (5) the co-creative team; (6) cyber-creative products; (7) cyber-creative domains; (8) cyber-creative education; (9) ethical aspects; and (10) the dark side of cyber-creativity. For each dimension, a brief review of the state-of-the-art is provided, followed by the identification of a main research challenge, then specified into a list of research questions. Whereas there is no claim that this decalogue of research challenges represents an exhaustive classification, which would be an impossible objective, it still should serve as a valid starting point for future (but urgent) research endeavors, with the ambition to provide a significant contribution to the understanding, development, and alignment of AI to human values the realm of creativity.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Cyber-Creativity: A Decalogue of Research Challenges. · full record | OpenQuestion