ReviewJournal of Intelligence2025
Automatic- and Transformer-Based Automatic Item Generation: A Critical Review.
Review in Journal of Intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metric Quality of Intelligence Tests in Spain: Evidence from 13 National Test Commission Reviews.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article provides a critical review of conceptually different approaches to automatic and transformer-based automatic item generation. Based on a discussion of the current challenges that have arisen due to changes in the use of psychometric tests in recent decades, we outline the requirements that these approaches should ideally fulfill. Subsequently, each approach is examined individually to determine the extent to which it can contribute to meeting the challenges. In doing so, we will focus on the cost savings during the actual item construction phase, the extent to which they may contribute to enhancing test validity, and potential cost savings in the item calibration phase due to either a reduction in the sample size required for item calibration or a reduction in the item loss due to insufficient psychometric characteristics. In addition, the article also aims to outline common recurring themes across these conceptually different approaches and outline areas within each approach that warrant further scientific research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.