Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40863157›Full record

ReviewMetabolites2025

MALDI-TOF MS Biomarkers for Methicillin-Resistant

Pedro Santos, Irina Alho, Edna Ribeiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolites, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pedro SantosEscola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa (ESTeSL-IPL), Av. D. João II, Lote 4.69.01, Parque das Nações, 1990-096 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0008-0420-3266
Irina AlhoFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
Edna RibeiroEscola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa (ESTeSL-IPL), Av. D. João II, Lote 4.69.01, Parque das Nações, 1990-096 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1316-7750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesMethicillin-resistant

methodsA systematic review was conducted by searching databases such as PubMed and Web of Science for studies that focused on MRSA detection with biomarkers by MALDI-TOF MS, including all relevant studies published up to July 2024. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO registry.

resultsA total of 15 studies were selected for analysis. Data were extracted on study location, sample size, MALDI-TOF MS analyzer, sample preparation, methicillin resistance and sensitivity biomarkers, and the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models. Notably, PSM-mec and delta toxin were frequently reported as informative biomarkers, detectable at 2414 ± 2 Da and 3006 ± 2 Da, respectively. Additionally, eight studies used AI models to identify specific biomarkers differentiating methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive strains, based on differences in peak intensities or the exclusive presence of certain peaks. Moreover, two studies employed detection of MRSA in low concentrations from biological samples and others employed an optimized matrix solution for improved analysis.

conclusionsOverall, MALDI-TOF MS is not only a powerful tool for the identification of bacterial isolates but also shows strong potential for rapid, cost-effective detection of methicillin resistance in

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiomarkersdiscriminationMALDI-TOF MSmethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID40863157
PMCPMC12388497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.