ArticleDentistry journal2025
Comparative Evaluation of Customized CAD/CAM vs. Stock Titanium Abutments for Immediate Implant Placement in Class II Extraction Sockets: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Dentistry journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06791655 (Customized CAD/CAM Titanium-Milled Abutments Vs. Custom Abutments Over Immediate Implants in Class II Extraction Sockets in the Esthetic Zone), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Customized CAD/CAM Titanium-Milled Abutments Vs. Custom Abutments Over Immediate Implants in Class II Extraction Sockets in the Esthetic Zone: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Efficacy of topical erythropoietin gel and mouthwash for recurrent aphthous stomatitis in a randomized clinical trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Educational gaps and factors associated with artificial intelligence adoption among Egyptian periodontists: a multicenter cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- ChatGPT-5 vs oral medicine experts for rank-based differential diagnosis of oral lesions: a prospective, biopsy-validated comparison.Odontology · 2026Article
- A 3-Year Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Zirconia and Titanium Implant-Supported Overdentures.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Clinical and Patient Comparison of AI and Expert Digital Smile Design: A Prospective Paired Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Random study of clinical evaluation of cortical bone thickness before & five months after implant placement under natural masticatory forces using CBCT.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Article
- A Multimodal Large Language Model Framework for Clinical Subtyping and Malignant Transformation Risk Prediction in Oral Lichen Planus: A Paired Comparison With Expert Clinicians.International dental journal · 2026Article
- A prospective randomized split-mouth trial comparing immediate versus early anterior implant placement with customized healing abutments: 12-month marginal bone loss, stability, and esthetic outcome.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Influence of different customized abutment materials on stress distribution of different internal implant-abutment connections: finite element analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Digital Accuracy of Closed-Tray Implant Impressions: Influence of Polyvinyl Siloxane Viscosity and Subgingival Posterior Implant Angulation.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmediate implant placement in the esthetic zone, particularly in Class II extraction sockets with partial facial bone loss, presents challenges in achieving soft and hard tissue stability. Customized computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) titanium abutments may offer advantages over prefabricated stock abutments. This study compared the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes of customized CAD/CAM titanium abutments versus stock Laser-Lok stock abutments. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn a single-center, double-blind randomized clinical trial, 48 patients received immediate maxillary anterior implants restored with either customized CAD/CAM titanium abutments (
resultsAt 12 months, the customized abutment group showed significantly shallower PD (mean difference: -0.54 mm; 95% CI: -0.72 to -0.35;
conclusionsAt 1-year follow-up, customized CAD/CAM titanium abutments demonstrated improved peri-implant soft tissue parameters, esthetics, and patient satisfaction compared to stock abutments. While these findings support their use in esthetically demanding immediate implant cases, the short-term duration and single-center design warrant further long-term multicenter studies to confirm durability.
trial registrationRegistered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 19/01/2025 (NCT06791655).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.