ReviewBiosensors2025
Protecting Firefighters from Carcinogenic Exposure: Emerging Tools for PAH Detection and Decontamination.
Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Absorption-Based PDMS/f-CNT Mass-Capacitor for Continuous Monitoring of Fire-Derived Organic Contamination.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Optical Biosensors-Principles of Operation and Applications.Micromachines · 2026Review
- DNAzyme-Based Nanostructures for Dynamic Cell Regulation and Sensing.ChemistryOpen · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are increasingly recognized as a major contributor to the occupational cancer risk among firefighters. In response, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and other regulatory bodies have recommended rigorous decontamination protocols to minimize PAH exposure. Despite these efforts, a critical gap persists: the absence of real-time, field-deployable devices capable of detecting these invisible and toxic compounds during firefighting operations or within fire stations. Additionally, the lack of effective and optimized methods for the removal of these hazardous substances from the immediate environments of firefighters continues to pose a serious occupational health challenge. Although numerous studies have investigated PAH detection in environmental contexts, current technologies are still largely confined to laboratory settings and are unsuitable for field use. This review critically examines recent advances in PAH decontamination strategies for firefighting and explores alternative sensing solutions. We evaluate both conventional analytical methods, such as gas chromatography, high-performance liquid chromatography, and mass spectrometry, and emerging portable PAH detection technologies. By highlighting the limitations of existing systems and presenting novel sensing approaches, this paper aims to catalyze innovation in sensor development. Our ultimate goal is to inspire the creation of robust, field-deployable tools that enhance decontamination practices and significantly improve the health and safety of firefighters by reducing their long-term risks of cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.