ArticleBiosensors2025
Microneedle-Tissue Interaction Across Varying Biological and Mechanical Conditions.
Article in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biphasic Co-Delivery of Curcumin and 5-FU using 3D-Printed Dissolving Microneedles for Skin Cancer Therapy.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Bio-inspired suction cup microneedle loaded fusion membrane targeting nano-drug delivery system treat androgenetic alopecia.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microneedle (MN)-tissue interactions play a critical role in the efficiency and reliability of transdermal drug delivery and biosensing, yet their mechanistic understanding remains limited. This study systematically investigates the effects of biological (tissue type and temperature) and mechanical (needle design, material, and insertion velocity) parameters on the performance of microneedle insertion and extraction. Experiments were performed on porcine skin, chicken breast, and agarose gel to represent varying tissue properties. Additionally, the effect of tissue temperature on replicating physiological conditions, such as hypo- and hyperthermia, was evaluated using porcine skin as the sample. A novel conical MN design integrated with surface suction-cup structures was developed to improve tissue adhesion. Mechanical responses were analyzed through force-displacement measurements, evaluating insertion force, extraction force, and relaxation time. Results show that elevated tissue temperature reduces insertion and extraction forces while shortening relaxation times, indicating increased tissue compliance. The suction-cup MNs significantly enhanced needle-tissue adhesion, with the most pronounced effect observed in chicken breast tissue, achieving more than a four-fold increase in extraction force compared to conventional conical needles. These findings provide valuable insights into optimizing the design of MNs for advanced biomedical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.