ReviewBiosensors2025
Microfluidic Platforms for Ex Vivo and In Vivo Gene Therapy.
Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of miRNAs in Regulating Neurovascular Unit Homeostasis: Bidirectional Communication and Therapeutic Insights in Ischemic Stroke.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- 80 years of extracellular vesicles: from discovery to clinical translation.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent studies have demonstrated the clinical potential of nucleic acid therapeutics (NATs). However, their efficient and scalable delivery remains a major challenge for both ex vivo and in vivo gene therapy. Microfluidic platforms have emerged as a powerful tool for overcoming these limitations by enabling precise intracellular delivery and consistent therapeutic carrier fabrication. This review examines microfluidic strategies for gene delivery at the cellular level. These strategies include mechanoporation, electroporation, and sonoporation. We also discuss the synthesis of lipid nanoparticles, polymeric particles, and extracellular vesicles for systemic administration. Unlike conventional approaches, which treat ex vivo and in vivo delivery as separate processes, this review focuses on integrated microfluidic systems that unify these functions. For example, genetic materials can be delivered to cells that secrete therapeutic extracellular vesicles (EVs), or engineered cells can be encapsulated within hydrogels for implantation. These strategies exemplify the convergence of gene delivery and carrier engineering. They create a single workflow that bridges cell-level manipulation and tissue-level targeting. By synthesizing recent technological advances, this review establishes integrated microfluidic platforms as being fundamental to the development of next-generation NAT systems that are scalable, programmable, and clinically translatable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.