ReviewBiosensors2025
Insights to Resistive Pulse Sensing of Microparticle and Biological Cells on Microfluidic Chip.
Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since the initial use of biological ion channels to detect single-stranded genomic base pair differences, label-free and highly sensitive resistive pulse sensing (RPS) with nanopores has made remarkable progress in single-molecule analysis. By monitoring transient ionic current disruptions caused by molecules translocating through a nanopore, this technology offers detailed insights into the structure, charge, and dynamics of the analytes. In this work, the RPS platforms based on biological, solid-state, and other sensing pores, detailing their latest research progress and applications, are reviewed. Their core capability is the high-precision characterization of tiny particles, ions, and nucleotides, which are widely used in biomedicine, clinical diagnosis, and environmental monitoring. However, current RPS methods involve bottlenecks, including limited sensitivity (weak signals from sub-nanometer targets with low SNR), complex sample interference (high false positives from ionic strength, etc.), and field consistency (solid-state channel drift, short-lived bio-pores failing POCT needs). To overcome this, bio-solid-state fusion channels, in-well reactors, deep learning models, and transfer learning provide various options. Evolving into an intelligent sensing ecosystem, RPS is expected to become a universal platform linking basic research, precision medicine, and on-site rapid detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.