ArticleBiosensors2025
Robust Prediction of Cardiorespiratory Signals from a Multimodal Physiological System on the Upper Arm.
Article in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many commercial wearable sensor systems typically rely on a single continuous cardiorespiratory sensing modality, photoplethysmography (PPG), which suffers from inherent biases (i.e., differences in skin tone) and noise (e.g., motion and pressure artifacts). In this research, we present a wearable device that provides robust estimates of cardiorespiratory variables by combining three physiological signals from the upper arm: multiwavelength PPG, single-sided electrocardiography (SS-ECG), and bioimpedance plethysmography (BioZ), along with an inertial measurement unit (IMU) providing 3-axis accelerometry and gyroscope information. We evaluated the multimodal device on 16 subjects by its ability to estimate heart rate (HR) and breathing rate (BR) in the presence of various static and dynamic noise sources (e.g., skin tone and motion). We proposed a hierarchical approach that considers the subject's skin tone and signal quality to select the optimal sensing modality for estimating HR and BR. Our results indicate that, when estimating HR, there is a trade-off between accuracy and robustness, with SS-ECG providing the highest accuracy (low mean absolute error; MAE) but low reliability (higher rates of sensor failure), and PPG/BioZ having lower accuracy but higher reliability. When estimating BR, we find that fusing estimates from multiple modalities via ensemble bagged tree regression outperforms single-modality estimates. These results indicate that multimodal approaches to cardiorespiratory monitoring can overcome the accuracy-robustness trade-off that occurs when using single-modality approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.