ReviewBiosensors2025
Recent Progress in Electrocatalysts for Hydroquinone Electrochemical Sensing Application.
Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electropolymerized Molecularly Imprinted Polymers Supported on Carbon-Based Materials for (Bio)sensing: Direct and Indirect Detection Strategies.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Fe/Mo-doped carbon dots as a bifunctional nanozyme for self-validating colorimetric and fluorometric sensing of hydroquinone.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Article
- From structure to function: a one-dimensional palladium(ii) hybrid for real-sample hydroquinone detection.RSC advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review article compiled previous reports in the fabrication of hydroquinone (HQ) electrochemical sensors using differently modified electrodes. The electrode materials, which are also called electrocatalysts, play a crucial role in electrochemical detection of biomolecules and toxic substances. Metal oxides, MXenes, carbon-based materials such as reduced graphene oxide (rGO), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), layered double hydroxides (LDH), metal sulfides, and hybrid composites were extensively utilized in the fabrication of HQ sensors. The electrochemical performance, including limit of detection, linearity, sensitivity, selectivity, stability, reproducibility, repeatability, and recovery for real-time sensing of the HQ sensors have been discussed. The limitations, challenges, and future directions are also discussed in the conclusion section. It is believed that the present review article may benefit researchers who are involved in the development of HQ sensors and catalyst preparation for electrochemical sensing of other toxic substances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.