ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Structure Design and Performance Study of Bionic Electronic Nasal Cavity.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Presence-gated VOC sensing for urban search and rescue applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Analysis of Olfactive Prints from Artificial Lung Cancer Volatolome with Nanocomposite-Based vQRS Arrays for Healthcare.Biosensors · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A miniaturised bionic electronic nose system was developed to solve the problems of expensive equipment and long response time for soil pesticide residue detection. The structure of the bionic electronic nasal cavity is designed based on the spatial structure and olfactory principle of the sturgeon nasal cavity. Through experimental study, the structure of the nasal cavity of the sturgeon was extracted and analyzed. The 3D model of the bionic electronic nasal cavity was constructed and verified by Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation. The results show that the gas flow distribution in the bionic chamber is more uniform than that in the ordinary chamber. The airflow velocity near the sensor in the bionic chamber is lower than in the ordinary chamber. The eddy current intensity near the bionic chamber sensor is 2.29 times that of the ordinary chamber, further increasing the contact intensity between odor molecules and the sensor surface and shortening the response time. The 10-fold cross-validation method of K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN), Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) was used to compare the recognition performance of the bionic electronic nasal cavity with that of the ordinary electronic nasal cavity. The results showed that, when the bionic electronic nose detection system identified the concentration of pesticide residues in soil, the recognition rate of the above three recognition algorithms reached 97.3%, significantly higher than that of the comparison chamber. The bionic chamber electronic nose system can improve the detection performance of electronic noses and has a good application prospect in soil pesticide residue detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.