Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40862897›Full record

ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

State-of-the-Art Organ-on-Chip Models and Designs for Medical Applications: A Systematic Review.

Gustavo Adolfo Marcelino de Almeida Nunes, Ana Karoline Almeida da Silva, Rafael Mendes Faria, Klériston Silva Santos, Arthur da Costa Aguiar, Lindemberg Barreto Mota da Costa, Glécia Virgolino da Silva Luz, Marcella Lemos Brettas Carneiro, Mário Fabrício Fleury Rosa, Graziella Anselmo Joanitti and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Gustavo Adolfo Marcelino de Almeida NunesPostgraduate Programme in Mechatronic Systems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, DF, Brazil.
Ana Karoline Almeida da SilvaPostgraduate Programme in Mechatronic Systems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9340-6568
Rafael Mendes FariaPostgraduate Programme in Mechatronic Systems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0155-0392
Klériston Silva SantosPostgraduate Programme in Mechatronic Systems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5475-0841
Arthur da Costa AguiarPostgraduate Programme in Mechatronic Systems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0001-3667-7502
Lindemberg Barreto Mota da CostaPostgraduate Programme in Biomedical Engineering, Department of Eletronic Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering Technologies (FCTE), University of Brasilia, Gama 72444-240, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4860-6565
Glécia Virgolino da Silva LuzPostgraduate Programme in Biomedical Engineering, Department of Eletronic Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering Technologies (FCTE), University of Brasilia, Gama 72444-240, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5385-6174
Marcella Lemos Brettas CarneiroPostgraduate Programme in Biomedical Engineering, Department of Eletronic Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering Technologies (FCTE), University of Brasilia, Gama 72444-240, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6165-0969
Mário Fabrício Fleury RosaPostgraduate Programme in Biomedical Engineering, Department of Eletronic Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering Technologies (FCTE), University of Brasilia, Gama 72444-240, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4821-9007
Graziella Anselmo JoanittiPostgraduate Programme in Biomedical Engineering, Department of Eletronic Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering Technologies (FCTE), University of Brasilia, Gama 72444-240, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6888-1284
Karoany Maria IbiapinaResearch and Innovation Center in Organ-on-a-Chip at the University of Brasilia, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, DF, Brazil.
Ana Karen Gonçalves de Barros GomesResearch and Innovation Center in Organ-on-a-Chip at the University of Brasilia, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, DF, Brazil.
Adson Ferreira da RochaPostgraduate Programme in Biomedical Engineering, Department of Eletronic Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering Technologies (FCTE), University of Brasilia, Gama 72444-240, DF, Brazil.
Suélia de Siqueira Rodrigues Fleury RosaPostgraduate Programme in Mechatronic Systems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1247-9050

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organ-on-a-chip (OoC) devices simulate human organs within a microenvironment, potentially surpassing traditional preclinical methods and paving the way for innovative treatments. A thorough understanding of the current state of OoC design enables the development of more precise and relevant models that replicate not only the structure of organs but also their intricate cellular interactions and responses to external stimuli. This knowledge facilitates the optimization of biomimetic materials and allows for the real-time simulation of physiological microenvironments. By keeping abreast of new microfabrication techniques, we can explore opportunities to create customized and highly functional OoCs.

objectiveTo provide a comprehensive overview of microphysiological platform designs.

methodsThis systematic review was registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42022352569. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The eligibility criteria included studies utilizing human tissue, either primary or secondary lineage cells.

resultsA total of 9.790 papers were retrieved from the Scopus, Embase, IEEE and Web of Science databases. After removing duplicates and applying a 10-year publication filter, 3.150 articles were screened by title and abstract. Full-text analyses were then performed. Eighteen studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review. In this review, we examine the principles of OoC design, focusing on structure, dimensions, cell culturing options and manufacturing techniques. We also examine recent advances and future prospects in the field.

conclusionsMicrophysiological devices in health research can facilitate drug discovery and improve our understanding of human physiology. They contribute to more ethical research by reducing the number of animals used in experiments.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingcell microenvironmentmicrofluidicsmicrophysiological systemsOrgan-on-a-ChipPatient-Specific Modelstranslational medicine

Identifiers

PMID40862897
PMCPMC12383757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.