ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Development of an Artificial Neural Network-Based Tool for Predicting Failures in Composite Laminate Structures.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Composite materials are widely used in aerospace, automotive, biomedical, and renewable energy sectors due to their high strength-to-weight ratio and design flexibility. However, their anisotropic and layered nature makes structural analysis and failure prediction challenging. Traditional methods require solving complex interlaminar stress-strain equations, demanding significant computational resources. This paper presents a bio-inspired machine learning approach, based on human reasoning, to accelerate predictions and reduce dependence on computationally intensive Finite Element Analysis (FEA). An artificial neural network model was developed to rapidly estimate key parameters-laminate thickness, total weight, maximum stress, displacement, deformation, and failure criteria-based on stacking sequence and geometry for a desired load case. Although validated using a specific composite beam, the methodology demonstrates potential for broader use in rapid structural assessment, with prediction deviations under 15% compared to FEA results. The time savings are particularly significant-while conventional FEA can take several hours or even days, the ANN model delivers accurate predictions within seconds. The approach significantly reduces computational time while maintaining precision. Moreover, with further refinement, this logic-driven model could be effectively applied to aircraft maintenance, enabling faster decision-making and improved structural reliability assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.