ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
NEuroMOrphic Neural-Response Decoding System for Adaptive and Personalized Neuro-Prosthetics' Control.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuromorphic Technologies for Neuroengineering: From Adaptive Stimulation to SNN-Based Inference and Deployable Biointerfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In our previous work, we developed a neuromorphic decoder of intended movements of tetraplegic patients using ECoG recordings from the brain motor cortex, called Motor Control Decoder (MCD). Even though the training data are labeled based on the desired movement, there is no guarantee that the patient is satisfied by the action of the effectors. Hence, the need for the classification of brain signals as satisfactory/unsatisfactory is obvious. Based on previous work, we upgrade our neuromorphic MCD with a Neural Response Decoder (NRD) that is intended to predict whether ECoG data are satisfactory or not in order to improve MCD accuracy. The main aim is to design an actor-critic structure able to adapt via reinforcement learning the MCD (actor) based on NRD (critic) predictions. For this aim, NRD was trained using not only an ECoG signal but also the MCD prediction or prescribed intended movement of the patient. The achieved accuracy of the trained NRD is satisfactory and contributes to improved MCD performance. However, further work has to be carried out to fully utilize the NRD for MCD performance optimization in an on-line manner. Possibility to include feedback from the patient would allow for further improvement of MCD-NRD accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.