Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40862881›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Surface Assessment of a Novel Acid-Etching Solution on CAD/CAM Dental Ceramics.

Fabio Andretti, Carlos A Jurado, Mark Antal, Alfredo I Hernandez, Silvia Rojas-Rueda, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Brian R Morrow, Hamid Nurrohman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fabio AndrettiDivision of Oper Dent, Department of General Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3075-6250
Carlos A JuradoDivision of Oper Dent, Department of General Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38104, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7437-4855
Mark AntalDepartment of Operative and Esthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-4109-9356
Alfredo I HernandezProsthodontics Department, Arizona School of Dentistry and Oral Health, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ 85206, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-4707-8955
Silvia Rojas-RuedaDivision of Dental Biomaterials, Department of Clinical and Community Sciences, School of Dentistry, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-3245-5245
Franklin Garcia-GodoyDepartment of Bioscience Research, College of Dentistry, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8133-3306
Brian R MorrowDepartment of Bioscience Research, College of Dentistry, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6649-0338
Hamid NurrohmanDepartment of Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, The University of Texas School of Dentistry, Houston, TX 77054, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigated a new multi-acid-etching formulation for zirconia ceramics, containing hydrochloric, hydrofluoric, nitric, orthophosphoric, and sulfuric acids. The solution was tested on polycrystalline (5Y-TZP zirconia), lithium disilicate, hybrid ceramic, and feldspathic porcelain to assess compatibility, etching selectivity, and surface conditioning.

methodsTwo-hundred-and-forty CAD/CAM specimens were etched for 20 s, 60 s, 30 min, or 1 h, and their surface roughness and etching patterns ware evaluated using 3D optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

resultsA positive correlation was observed between etching time and surface roughness (Ra values). The most pronounced changes were observed in lithium disilicate and feldspathic porcelain, with Ra values increasing from 0.733 ± 0.082 µm (Group 5) to 1.295 ± 0.123 µm (Group 8), and from 0.902 ± 0.102 µm (Group 13) to 1.480 ± 0.096 µm (Group 16), respectively. Zirconia increased from 0.181 ± 0.043 µm (Group 1) to 0.371 ± 0.074 µm (Group 4), and the hybrid ceramic from 0.053 ± 0.008 µm (Group 9) to 0.099 ± 0.016 µm (Group 12). Two-way ANOVA revealed significant effects of material and etching time, as well as a significant interaction between the two factors (

conclusionsThe tested etching solution increased surface roughness, especially for the lithium disilicate and feldspathic porcelain specimens. In zirconia, one-hour etching improved surface characteristics with minimal observable damage. However, additional studies are necessary to validate the mechanical stability and bond effectives of this approach.

Indexed as

dental ceramicmulti-acid etchingsurface properties

Identifiers

PMID40862881
PMCPMC12383666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.