ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
An Enhanced Slime Mould Algorithm Based on Best-Worst Management for Numerical Optimization Problems.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Slime Mould Algorithm (SMA) is a widely used swarm intelligence algorithm. Encouraged by the theory of no free lunch and the inherent shortcomings of the SMA, this work proposes a new variant of the SMA, called the BWSMA, in which three improvement mechanisms are integrated. The adaptive greedy mechanism is used to accelerate the convergence of the algorithm and avoid ineffective updates. The best-worst management strategy improves the quality of the population and increases its search capability. The stagnant replacement mechanism prevents the algorithm from falling into a local optimum by replacing stalled individuals. In order to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, this paper conducts a full range of experiments on the CEC2018 test suite and the CEC2022 test suite and compares BWSMA with three derived algorithms, eight SMA variants, and eight other improved algorithms. The experimental results are analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, the Friedman test, and the Nemenyi test. The results indicate that the BWSMA significantly outperforms these compared algorithms. In the comparison with the SMA variants, the BWSMA obtained average rankings of 1.414, 1.138, 1.069, and 1.414. In comparison with other improved algorithms, the BWSMA obtained average rankings of 2.583 and 1.833. Finally, the applicability of the BWSMA is further validated through two structural optimization problems. In conclusion, the proposed BWSMA is a promising algorithm with excellent search accuracy and robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.