Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40862840›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Treatment Disparities, Heterogeneities, and Barriers to Access for Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: A National Survey from Brazil.

Heloisa Resende, Vinícius de Q Aguiar, Nataline F de A Santos, João Vitor Siqueira Jardim, André Ornelas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heloisa ResendeCentro Universitário de Volta Redonda (UniFOA), Volta Redonda 27240-560, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Vinícius de Q AguiarCentro Universitário de Volta Redonda (UniFOA), Volta Redonda 27240-560, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Nataline F de A SantosCentro Universitário de Volta Redonda (UniFOA), Volta Redonda 27240-560, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
João Vitor Siqueira JardimCentro Universitário de Volta Redonda (UniFOA), Volta Redonda 27240-560, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0006-3329-4991
André OrnelasNovartis Brazil, São Paulo 04706-900, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0008-3019-2687

Funding

Novartis Brazil N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy among Brazilian women, with a high percentage of the cases diagnosed at advanced or metastatic stages (mBC). In Brazil, where 75% of the population depends on the resource-limited public health system (SUS), mBC poses significant treatment challenges and disparities. To characterize this scenario, we conducted an online survey assessing treatment strategies available for HER2-negative, hormone receptor (HR)-positive mBC across public and private health systems. The 48-question survey addressed topics such as waiting time (WT) from oncology unit entry to treatment initiation, availability of oncologic medications, and access to palliative and multidisciplinary care teams. Between 2 August 2022 and 30 September 2022, a total of 180 oncologists were invited, and 150 met the inclusion criteria. The median WT for surgery was 60 days in the SUS versus 30 days in the private sector (

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityBrazilErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisReceptors, EstrogenSurveys and QuestionnairesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, Estrogenmedicinesmetastatic breast canceroncological assistancepublic health system

Identifiers

PMID40862840
PMCPMC12384988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.