Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40862837›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Targeting Senescence in Oncology: An Emerging Therapeutic Avenue for Cancer.

Satoru Meguro, Syunta Makabe, Kei Yaginuma, Akifumi Onagi, Ryo Tanji, Kanako Matsuoka, Seiji Hoshi, Tomoyuki Koguchi, Emina Kayama, Junya Hata and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Satoru MeguroDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2179-5028
Syunta MakabeDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Kei YaginumaDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Akifumi OnagiDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Ryo TanjiDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Kanako MatsuokaDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0731-4577
Seiji HoshiDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1545-1827
Tomoyuki KoguchiDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Emina KayamaDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Junya HataDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7912-5468
Yuichi SatoDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Hidenori AkaihataDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Masao KataokaDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Soichiro OgawaDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Motohide UemuraDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Yoshiyuki KojimaDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since cancer is often linked to the aging process, the importance of cellular senescence in cancer has come under the spotlight. While senescence in cancer cells can serve as a natural barrier against cancer due to its proliferation arrest, its secretory phenotypes and alterations in the surface proteome can paradoxically promote or suppress tumor progression. Senescent cancer-associated fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and immune cells can also contribute to cancer promotion. During therapeutic interventions for cancer, not only their therapeutic effects, but also therapy-induced senescence may have an impact on cancer outcomes. Senotherapeutics, therapy targeting senescent cells, have been reported as novel cancer therapy in recent studies, and the combination of senescence induction and senotherapeutics has been increasingly recognized. Although some clinical trials of senotherapeutic drugs for cancer with or without senescence-inducible therapy are ongoing, there is as yet no satisfactory clinical application. With further research into targeting senescence in oncology, it is expected that senotherapeutics, particularly in combination with senescence-inducing therapy, will become a novel therapeutic strategy.

Indexed as

Cellular SenescenceNeoplasmsSenotherapeuticsHumansSenotherapeuticscancercellular senescencesenotherapeuticstherapy-induced senescencetumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID40862837
PMCPMC12384773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.