ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025
Small-Molecule Drugs in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology.
Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nanotechnology in Pediatric Neurology: Applications and Innovations.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in molecular diagnostics have enabled precision medicine approaches in pediatric neuro-oncology, with small-molecule drugs emerging as promising therapeutic candidates targeting specific genetic and epigenetic alterations in central nervous system (CNS) tumors. This review provides a focused overview of several small-molecule agents under investigation or in early clinical use, including ONC201, tazemetostat, vorasidenib, CDK inhibitors, selinexor, and aurora kinase A inhibitors, among others. Highlighted are their mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic properties, early efficacy data, and tolerability in pediatric populations. Despite encouraging preclinical and early-phase results, most agents face limitations due to study heterogeneity, lack of large-scale pediatric randomized trials, and challenges in drug delivery to the CNS. The review underscores the critical need for robust prospective clinical trials for the integration of these therapies into pediatric neuro-oncology care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.