Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40862654›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2025

The asymmetry system properties of the visual system: Evidence from serial face processing.

Jun-Ming Yu, Haojiang Ying

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jun-Ming YuDepartment of Psychology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Haojiang YingDepartment of Psychology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision can be viewed as a continuous information processing, yet its underlying system properties have not been fully understood. Studies of visual serial dependence suggest that current perception is often biased by the preceding stimuli, raising the possibility of Markov-like processing-where only the previous state (not the ones before) affects the current one. In the current study, participants rated faces on two of three traits (attractiveness, trustworthiness, and dominance), presented in randomized sequences so each rating could be preceded by the same or a different trait. This design allowed us to examine how prior input (the face) and prior output (the perception) influence current judgment. Using derivative of Gaussian, Markov chain, and linear mixed-effects modeling, we found that serial dependence was disrupted-and both memoryless property and Markov assumptions were violated-when alternating between two traits for attractiveness and dominance but not under other conditions. These findings suggest that different facets of (presumably) the same visual computation can exhibit asymmetrical system properties. More broadly, our work shows how serial dependence can serve as a powerful tool to probe the underlying rules by which the visual system integrates past and present information.

Indexed as

Facial RecognitionVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansJudgmentMaleMarkov ChainsPhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40862654
PMCPMC12395802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.