ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026
Implementation of the 'Countdown to Theatre' Approach to Bridge the Evidence-Practice Gap in Paediatric Preoperative Fasting: A Quality Improvement Initiative.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementation of the 'Countdown to Theatre' Approach to Bridge the Evidence-Practice Gap in Paediatric Preoperative Fasting: A Quality Improvement Initiative.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the 'Countdown to Theatre' intervention, a co-designed nurse-led approach developed using the COM-B framework to address context-specific barriers and facilitators to preoperative fasting practices.
designA prospective mixed-method, pre-post study assessed the intervention's impact on fasting adherence and patient experience.
methodsParticipants included children booked for a procedure under general anaesthesia. Adherence was assessed through audited fasting duration, and patient experience was evaluated using caregiver/patient surveys. The intervention was implemented and monitored by nursing staff as a part of a structured quality improvement process. Nurses played a central role in embedding the approach into daily workflows and reinforcing fasting timelines
resultsOver 9 months, 901 observations were undertaken from 774 patients. Fasting duration decreased from 7.6 to 5.7 h (mean difference -1.94; 95% CI -3.04, -0.86). Parent-reported patient experience surveys showed improvement in many areas, including an increase in overall satisfaction (from 44.7% to 68.8%).
conclusionThe intervention successfully reduced prolonged fasting and improved patient experiences, demonstrating the value of co-designed approaches in addressing evidence-practice gaps in perioperative care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: The principles of co-design, structured implementation and the application of the COM-B framework provide a replicable model for addressing similar challenges in healthcare. The study highlights the pivotal role of nurses in improving perioperative practices, supporting both patient safety and satisfaction. Future research should explore the intervention's applicability across diverse settings and patient populations. IMPACT: Despite evidence-based guidelines, excessive preoperative fasting remains prevalent in practice. This study demonstrates that a structured, nurse-led intervention can successfully reduce fasting durations and enhance patient experience, reaffirming the nursing profession's capacity to lead meaningful change in perioperative care. REPORTING
methodStandards for quality improvement reporting excellence (SQUIRE 2.0). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients and caregivers contributed to the co-design of the intervention, ensuring that it addressed practical challenges related to preoperative fasting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.