ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2025
Acoustic prominence: Understanding speech patterns in children with Down syndrome.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prominence in speech refers to the emphasis placed on certain words or syllables in English, making their salience through increased duration, increased intensity, and sometimes f0 dynamics. By marking acoustic prominence, speakers distinguish new from given information in speech. While a large body of relevant literature exists on how acoustic prominence is acoustically realized in typically developing (TD) children, little is known about how children with Down syndrome (DS) mark it. In this study, a "Puppet Show" task was conducted with 22 TD children and ten children with DS, one of whom was excluded because they were unable to produce the required target utterances despite multiple attempts, to compare the acoustic parameters used when distinguishing new and given information, focusing on mean f0, mean intensity, duration, and time-normalized f0. By using linear mixed-effects models and generalized additive mixed models, we demonstrated that children with DS have significantly higher overall mean f0 and lower intensity compared to TD children. The duration was not significantly different between the two groups. Our analysis further revealed distinct f0 contour patterns in the speech of DS children. While TD children exhibited clear rising and falling f0 contours to signal new and given information, DS children showed less controlled f0 contour patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.