Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40862509›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurochemistry2025

Synaptic Vesicle Recycling at the Developing Presynapse.

Nawon Kim, Michael A Cousin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Molecular Physiology of the Neuronal Synapse.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nawon KimCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5418-7152
Michael A CousinCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1762-160X

Funding

Simons Foundation 529508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurotransmitter release plays a fundamental role in brain communication. This is mediated via the exocytosis of neurotransmitter-containing synaptic vesicles (SVs) at the presynapse. After fusion with the presynaptic plasma membrane, SVs are regenerated by endocytosis and recycled back into functional pools. The great majority of research that has studied this essential process has focused on SV recycling at the mature presynaptic terminal. In contrast, SV recycling in immature neurons remains poorly understood, even though its disruption is heavily associated with a series of neurodevelopmental disorders. Evidence is accumulating that developing neurons display distinct presynaptic mechanisms for SV recycling. For example, developing presynapses display loose coupling between evoked calcium influx and SV fusion, with spontaneous SV exocytosis and clathrin-mediated endocytosis being the dominant exocytosis and endocytosis mechanisms respectively. In contrast, SV fusion in mature nerve terminals is tightly coupled to evoked calcium influx, with evoked SV exocytosis and endosomal modes of endocytosis dominant. This article reviews research at each stage of the SV recycling process at both mature and immature nerve terminals, beginning with the coupling of activity-dependent calcium influx to neurotransmitter release. In doing so, it aims to provide an integrated perspective of current knowledge regarding SV recycling through development across different neuronal systems, while posing key future questions to address for the presynaptic development field.

Indexed as

Presynaptic TerminalsSynaptic VesiclesAnimalsEndocytosisExocytosisHumansSynaptic Transmissioncalciumendocytosisexocytosisneurotransmitterpresynapsesynaptic maturationsynaptogenesisvesicle

Identifiers

PMID40862509
PMCPMC12382320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.