ArticleBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica2025
A machine learning approach to predict positive coronary artery calcium scores in individuals with diabetes: a cross-sectional analysis of ELSA-Brasil baseline data.
Article in Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is unclear who benefits the most from atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) screening imaging. This study aimed to identify features associated with positive coronary artery calcium scores (CACS) in individuals with diabetes using machine learning (ML) techniques. ELSA-Brasil is a cohort study with 15,105 participants aged 35 to 74 years in six Brazilian cities. We analyzed 25 sociodemographic, medical history, symptom-related, and laboratory variables from 585 participants from the São Paulo investigation center with CACS data and no overt cardiovascular disease at baseline. We used six ML algorithms to build models to identify individuals with positive CACS. Feature importance was determined by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. The best performer ML algorithm was the XGBoost Classifier (accuracy: 94.8%). Age (SHAP: 0.220), systolic blood pressure (SHAP: 0.102), and body mass index (SHAP: 0.075) were the most important variables to identify ASCVD in individuals with diabetes in XGBoost models. Considering all ML models in our analysis, age, systolic blood pressure, and sex were frequently influential variables. We obtained high accuracy with our best model, using information generally present in current clinical practice. ML models may help clinicians select patients with characteristics most probably associated with a positive CAC. Age, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, and sex may be useful markers to identify those at higher risk for subclinical ASCVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.