ArticleBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica2025
Drug-induced pulmonary edema: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
Article in Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Calcium channel blocker-associated pulmonary toxicity: epidemiology, mechanisms, and clinical management.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to systematically evaluate the risk of drug-induced pulmonary edema (DIPE) using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. This retrospective pharmacovigilance study utilized FAERS data from the first quarter of 2004 to the second quarter of 2024. We identified drugs with at least 10 reported DIPE cases as primary suspects (PS). The DIPE signals were assessed using four methods: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM). Multivariate logistic regression was employed to control for confounding factors, and the timing of DIPE onset was statistically analyzed. Out of 173 target drugs, 37 were identified with DIPE risk. The top five drugs were naloxone, dasatinib, nifedipine, anti-thymocyte globulin, and pioglitazone. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that all except pioglitazone were independent risk factors for DIPE. The onset time of DIPE varied by age and gender for some drugs. This study is the first to identify the DIPE risk systematically associated with multiple drugs. It highlights the need for clinicians and pharmacists to be aware of these high-risk drugs and to monitor high-risk populations closely to ensure medication safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.