Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40862452›Full record

ReviewInternal medicine journal2025

Narcolepsy 2025 (with an Australasian perspective).

Amelia Lin, Brendon J Yee, Jian Eu Tai, Sheila Sivam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Internal medicine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amelia LinCIRUS Centre for Sleep and Chronobiology, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-8112-8221
Brendon J YeeCIRUS Centre for Sleep and Chronobiology, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jian Eu TaiCIRUS Centre for Sleep and Chronobiology, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sheila SivamCIRUS Centre for Sleep and Chronobiology, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Narcolepsy is a disorder of central hypersomnolence, which, while uncommon, can carry profound implications for affected individuals. Despite this, it remains under-recognised within the medical community and presents frequent diagnostic and treatment challenges in the Australasian setting. Narcolepsy is subdivided into narcolepsy type 1, characterised by cataplexy and deficiency of the neuropeptide orexin, and narcolepsy type 2, a distinct entity. The latter can be further difficult to distinguish from the separate central hypersomnolence disorder idiopathic hypersomnia. Implementation of diagnostic criteria to distinguish these conditions is not always straightforward, however, with consideration of comorbidities and test conditions required to avoid misdiagnoses. Within Australia and New Zealand, narcolepsy remains relatively ill-defined on a population level compared to other developed nations, and greater challenges exist in access to diagnostic testing and therapeutic options. Internationally, orexin receptor 2 agonists have displayed promise as oral therapy to target the neurobiological basis of narcolepsy, particularly narcolepsy type 1, with further testing underway. We discuss practical challenges and updates in narcolepsy from an Australasian perspective, with a view to improve awareness of narcolepsy in both primary and specialty medicine to support access to care for individuals with the condition.

Indexed as

NarcolepsyAustralasiaAustraliaHumansNew ZealandOrexinsOrexinscataplexyhypersomnolencenarcolepsyorexin

Identifiers

PMID40862452
PMCPMC12608058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.