ArticleCadernos de saude publica2025
Recent temporal trends in cesarean section rates in Brazil according to the Robson classification system.
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitudes and practices of Brazilian obstetricians in relation to childbirth care.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Temporal trends in cesarean section (C-sections) rates were analyzed in Brazil and its regions using the Robson classification system. An ecological time-series study was conducted with data from the Brazilian Ministry of Health about C-section rates from 2014 to 2022. Joinpoint models were used to estimate percentage changes in C-section rate trends in the units of analysis. C-section rate in the study period was 56.4%. Robson groups with low expected C-section values (R1 to R4) represented 46% of the total rate of C-sections, with higher rates in the R2 and R4 groups. In these groups, rates increased significantly in Brazil and all its regions during the study period. However, a significant decrease in rates was observed in the R1 and R3 groups, from 2014 to 2016 in Brazil and in the North, Northeast, and Southeast regions. Despite its larger relative size among groups and greater contributions to the total C-section rate, the R5 group had a small but significant increase in rates in the Central-West Region only. Groups with higher expected values for C-sections (R6 to R10) showed a general upward trend, except for R9. The results indicate an excess of C-sections in Brazil and its regions, especially in low obstetric risk groups. Therefore, efforts to reduce unnecessary C-sections should be based on interventions to improve labor management in nulliparous women and promote vaginal birth after the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.