ArticleCadernos de saude publica2025
Radiotherapy services in Brazil: current scenario, challenges, and proposals for solutions.
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to provide a consensus-based short list of barriers and challenges to establish accessible radiotherapy services in Brazil and to discuss the managerial actions proposed to reduce the waiting time to initiate radiotherapy treatments. An e-Delphi study was made with no direct interaction between respondents. Virtual surveys were sent to physicians who had expertise in radiotherapy. A baseline list of 15 previously published barriers to radiotherapy access in low- and middle-income countries was put in topics. Participants had to rate the priority of including each of the 15 topics in future governmental interventions by using a 5-point Likert scale. Average scores for each topic were calculated and expressed as percentages. Consensus was achieved if the topic obtained a score of > 70% agreement among the participants that rated it as very high or high priority, plus being in the top five in the ranking list of importance. Four topics reached consensus. Two topics were related to costs (resources, funding models, and financial stability), one to policy environment (political instability), and one to poverty levels and planning distribution of technology. Such results form the basis for an action plan and the comprehensive priority topics should be considered in the efforts to provide better access to radiotherapy services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.