ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025
Care for ill-housed persons: access and professional proactivity in primary care.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto understand access to primary care for ill-housed persons and professional proactivity in municipalities without a Street Outreach Office.
methoda qualitative approach study, under the Grounded Theory methodological framework and Symbolic Interactionism theoretical framework, carried out with 30 Family Health Strategy professionals and six key informants from the Socio-Assistance Network, using open-ended interviews and memos.
resultsthe lack of planning for health care for ill-housed persons was evident. Access occurs through spontaneous demand and, almost always, under the intervention of Social Assistance Network professionals. Intersectoral and proactive professional work were highlighted as axes in overcoming inequities and guaranteeing access. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: the need to expand access is ratified, with identification, registration and monitoring of ill-housed persons in primary care. It is necessary to encourage professional proactivity, given their notoriety in strengthening equitable actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.