ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Post-marketing safety monitoring of RSV vaccines: A real-world study based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world evidence on RSV vaccine uptake, effectiveness, and safety in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- Double Trouble: The First Reported Case of Evans Syndrome Following RSV Vaccination.Hematology reports · 2025Article
- Real-world feasibility of co-administration of RSV, COVID-19, and influenza vaccines in older adults: a VAERS-based analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two protein subunit vaccines - RSVPreF3 (Arexvy, GSK) and RSVpreF (Abrysvo, Pfizer) - and one mRNA RSV vaccine, mRNA-1345 (mRESVIA, Moderna), have been approved. Post-marketing surveillance is crucial for evaluating the safety of RSV vaccines. We reviewed VAERS reports on RSV vaccines, using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) to identify safety signals. Our analysis incorporated severity, time-to-onset, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses to enhance key findings. After analyzing 5,147 RSVPreF3, 2,734 RSVpreF, and 35 mRNA-1345 reports, 91, 103, and 8 positive PT signals were found, respectively. Among serious reports, both RSVPreF3 and RSVpreF were associated with 9 important medical events (IMEs), including immune thrombocytopenia, which was also classified as a designated medical event (DME). Three pregnancy-related IME signals-hemorrhage in pregnancy, fetal death, and fetal hypokinesia - were reported for RSVpreF. Descriptive analysis of time-to-onset complemented the overall safety profiling, and sensitivity analysis offered further support for the observed disproportional reporting trends in certain adverse events (AEs). Our study utilized real-world data from large-scale spontaneous reporting systems to detect AEs that were disproportionately reported following RSV vaccination, thereby generating early safety signals to inform hypothesis development and support clinical awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.