Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40862288›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2025

Breast Pain in a Lactating Person: An Objective Structured Clinical Examination for Clerkship Students.

Nicola Young, Kelly Branford, Deborah L Engle, Sarah K Dotters-Katz, Andrea Dotson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicola YoungMedical Student, Duke University School of Medicine.
Kelly BranfordClinical Skills Program Director, Duke University School of Medicine.
Deborah L EngleAssistant Dean for Assessment and Evaluation, Duke University School of Medicine.
Sarah K Dotters-KatzAssociate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine.
Andrea DotsonAssistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Breastfeeding provides significant health benefits for families and cost-saving potential for health care systems. Physician support is crucial to lactation success. However, lactation education curricula across the US do not reliably meet published standards, and educators lack a standardized tool to assess student competency. We developed a breastfeeding-focused OSCE for UME learners that assesses students' application of lactation knowledge in clinical settings. Methods: This lactation OSCE for medical students includes a patient interview, postencounter note, and evaluation by a trained standardized patient (SP). OSCE performance was compared between clerkship students who participated in a pilot lactation curriculum and students who did not participate in this curriculum. Primary outcome was correct identification of primary diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included postencounter note total score, history score, management/counseling score, and SP communication score. Data were analyzed using bivariate statistics. Results: Twenty-eight students completed the OSCE, of whom 15 (54%) participated in the pilot lactation curriculum. Pilot students were more likely than nonpilot students to correctly identify the primary diagnosis (73% vs. 31%, Discussion: This OSCE effectively assesses UME learners' ability to clinically apply lactation knowledge.

Indexed as

Health EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeLactationMastodyniaStudents, MedicalAdultClinical ClerkshipCompetency-Based EducationCurriculumFemaleHumansLactation DisordersMaleUnited StatesBreastfeedingClinical Skills Assessment/OSCEsLactationStandardized Patient

Identifiers

PMID40862288
PMCPMC12371021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.