ReviewSAGE open medicine2025
A comprehensive systematic review of pharmacological and non-pharmacological depression interventions for patients on dialysis.
Review in SAGE open medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Depression affects 38%-80% of end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis, causing increased hospitalizations, treatment nonadherence, and mortality rates. While various interventions have been researched, a comprehensive assessment remains necessary to address the psychological burden effectively. Objective: To assess previous research from 2017 to 2023 on the efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for depressive symptoms in this group. Methods: A systematic review was performed across PubMed, ScienceDirect, Clinical Key, and Web of Science. Citations for inclusion and abstract extraction were assessed and confirmed by two independent researchers. Inclusion criteria consisted of clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, and prospective studies written in English. We excluded studies that were review articles, case reports, or editorials, or did not examine antidepressants, exercise, or other mental health interventions in dialysis patients. To assess risk of bias, the Risk of Bias 2 and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tools were utilized. Depressive symptoms were measured using different scales. Results: Among 911 screened citations, 30 articles were included, involving 1815 participants across 17 countries. Publications on antidepressant medication ( Conclusion: While interventions like antidepressants, intradialytic exercise, music therapy, and psychotherapy show potential for managing depression in dialysis patients, small sample sizes, lack of control groups, and short treatment durations continue to limit current studies. Future research should focus on multicenter trials with larger, more diversified populations and stronger study designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.