ArticleTopics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation2025
International Spinal Cord Injury Fracture History Extended Data Set.
Article in Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence and influencing factors of spinal cord injury-related osteoporosis and fragility fractures in Thai people with chronic spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional, observational study.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of the study is to develop the International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Fracture History Extended Data Set within the framework of the International SCI Data Sets to permit consistent collection and reporting of fracture history in the SCI population. Methods: The International SCI Fracture History Extended Data Set has been developed by a working group. The initial data set was open for 2 months for discussion and was revised based on suggestions from members of the International SCI Data Sets Committee, the International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS) Executive and Scientific Committees, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Board, other interested organizations, societies, and individual reviewers. The data set was also posted for 2 months for comments on ISCoS's and ASIA's websites. Results: The final data set contains questions on fractures after SCI. Because the information may be collected at any time, the date of data collection is important to capture relative to the time lapsed after SCI. The data set includes information on fracture history (location, etiology, treatment, complications for each fracture event), osteoporosis treatment (current and past use), bone measures by quantitative computed tomography (6 variables), and body composition (7 variables). The complete instructions for data collection and the data sheet itself are freely available on the ISCoS website (https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.iscos.org.uk/resource/resmgr/fracture/iscieds_fracture_1.pdf). Conclusion: The data set proposes to collect information on bone loss, other factors potentially predictive of fracture risk, and fracture in persons with SCI to guide clinical management and future research activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.