ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Effects of cotton straw added to total mixed pelleted feed on the composition of rumen microbiota in breeding ewes.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of adding increasing amounts of cotton straw to the feed of breeding ewes on the bacterial and fungal microbiota of the rumen. A single-factor, completely randomized design was adopted, in which 120 ewes of small-tailed Han sheep were randomly divided into six groups, 20 ewes per group. Control group 1 (CK1) was fed a diet without cotton straw, while control group 2 (CK2) contained cottonseed meal in place of cotton straw. The experimental groups were supplemented with 20% (M20 group), 30% (M30 group), 40% (M40 group), or 50% (M50 group) cotton straw. The trial included a 30-day pre-trial period and a 270-day formal trial period. The results showed that, among the rumen bacterial microbiota, there was no significant difference in the number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) between the groups. The ACE and Chao biodiversity indices of the CK2 group and M20-M50 groups were significantly lower than those of the CK1 group. Principle coordinate analysis (PCoA) of bacterial diversity revealed clear separation between the CK2 group and the M20-M50 groups compared with the CK1 group. With respect to rumen fungal microbiota, the M20 and M50 groups had the highest number of unique OTUs. There were no significant differences in abundance and diversity indices, and PCoA showed no obvious clustering differences among the groups. In summary, supplementing the basal diet with different proportions of cotton straw reduced the diversity of rumen bacteria and altered the composition of rumen bacterial and fungal communities. Adding more than 40% cotton straw significantly increased the abundance of Proteobacteria, which could have adverse effects on sheep growth performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.