ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Long-term behaviour of non-functioning pituitary microadenomas: experience from a tertiary care centre in Romania.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinician decision-making in non-functioning pituitary adenomas: an Australian and New Zealand interdisciplinary survey study.Pituitary · 2026Article
- Optical coherence tomography and electroretinography in pituitary macroadenomas: a 12-month analysis by age and tumor type.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: An optimal surveillance plan of micro-nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (micro-NFPAs) is not well established despite high prevalence and increasing incidence of these tumors. This study aims to characterize the natural history of conservatively treated micro-NFPAs and provide evidence for a management algorithm. Methods: Retrospective, single center cohort study that analyzed clinical, hormonal and imaging data of conservatively managed micro-NFPAs (years 2018-2023). Results: 371 patients with micro-NFPAs were included in the study (mean age at diagnosis 41.26 ± 13.71 years, 91.6% females) with a mean tumor size at detection of 5.51 ± 1.95 mm. Over a median follow-up period of 4.8 years (IQR 2-8.64): 23.7% of all micro-NFPAs were stable, 41% regressed and 35.3% had any progression in size (34.5% of patients had a significant tumor growth, when considering 1 mm enlargement as significant, with a growth incidence of 17.18 per 100 person-years, 95% CI: 14.2- 20,15). The median growth was 1 mm (IQR: 0.5-2) over the entire follow up period and only 2.42% microadenomas evolved into macroadenomas, without clinical consequences. Sex, BMI, age were not predictors of tumor growth, however tumors smaller than 6 mm had a 47.4% higher incidence rate of significant tumor growth (≥ 1mm) events per 100 person-years, compared to larger microadenomas. Alternating CT with MRI during follow-up is an important predictor for tumor variability. Median time until growth was 11.32 months (95%CI: 9.66- 12.97). At diagnosis, 1.1% had secondary hypogonadism, 1.1% hypothyroidism and 0.5% secondary hypoadrenalism. During follow-up, only 5 patients (1.3%) developed hypopituitarism after a median of 2 years (0.9-5.1), irrespective of tumor enlargement or other demographic and clinical factors. Conclusion: Micro-NFPAs have an overall benign clinical course, with a high measuring variability in tumors smaller than 6 mm and hypopituitarism is a very rare occurrence. Performing the first follow-up MRI at one year and if stable, delaying re-evaluation to 5 years, without pituitary function reassessment in absence of clinical manifestations, is a safe and cost-effective approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.