ReviewACS nanoscience Au2025
Using Electrochemistry to Benchmark, Understand, and Develop Noble Metal Nanoparticle Syntheses.
Review in ACS nanoscience Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accessible Chemical Benchmarking of Nanoparticle Growth Using Oxidation-Reduction Potential Sensors.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Real-Time Electroanalytical Measurements of Dynamic Reaction Chemistry Provide Generalizable Mechanistic Considerations for Metal Nanoparticle Synthesis.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Questioning Established Protocols for New and More Sustainable Syntheses of Nanomaterials.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complex chemical nature of metal nanoparticle synthesis presents obstacles for the mechanistic understanding of nanoparticle growth and predictive synthesis design, despite significant progress in this area. Real-time characterization of the chemical processes that take place throughout nanoparticle growth will enable progress toward addressing outstanding challenges in metal nanoparticle synthesis, such as mitigating synthetic reproducibility issues, defining chemical mechanisms that direct nanoparticle growth, and designing synthetic conditions for previously unachievable combinations of nanoparticle shape and composition. In this Perspective, we present open-circuit potential (OCP) measurements as an in situ, real-time method for characterizing chemical changes during nanoparticle growth and discuss the method's strengths in comparison to and in combination with other characterization techniques. We propose the use of OCP measurements as benchmarks for troubleshooting irreproducibility and streamlining synthetic optimization. Finally, we explore possibilities for using the increased parameter space accessible by electrodeposition to accelerate the development of shape-selective nanoparticle syntheses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.