Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40862060›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025

Study on the Evaluation of Hip Dysplasia by Measuring the Lateral Center-Edge Angle of Hip Joint on X-Ray Using Deep Learning Algorithm.

Xiao Wang, Zisheng Ai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiao WangSchool of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, People's Republic of China.
Zisheng AiSchool of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0009-7686-6875

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To study the effectiveness and value of using a deep learning algorithm to measure the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) of the hip joint on X-ray images for the evaluation of hip dysplasia. Methods: This retrospective study included 231 patients (462 hips) undergoing bilateral hip X-rays from February 2023 to February 2024. Two radiologists annotated key acetabular landmarks and femoral contours for model training. A deep learning model performed automatic LCEA measurements, which were compared to manual measurements by radiologists. Consistency was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and diagnostic performance was evaluated with ROC analysis. Results: A total of 462 hips were measured. There was no statistically significant difference between manual and automated measurements of left and right LCEA (P>0.05). The ICC measurements for manual and automated LCEA for the left and right hips were 0.936 and 0.902, respectively, with r-values of 0.929 and 0.913 (P<0.05). A total of 44 hips were diagnosed with hip dysplasia and 56 with borderline hip dysplasia. The sensitivity of automated measurements for diagnosing hip dysplasia was 88.64% (39/44), with an accuracy of 95.67% (442/462); the sensitivity for diagnosing borderline dysplasia was 66.07% (37/56), with an accuracy of 91.56% (423/462). The area under the curve (AUC) for diagnosing hip dysplasia using automated LCEA measurements (threshold of 25.24°) was 0.917 (P<0.05). Conclusion: The deep learning algorithm for measuring bilateral hip LCEA on X-rays has good efficacy in diagnosing hip dysplasia, with an AUC of up to 0.917.

Indexed as

deep learning algorithmhip dysplasiahip jointlateral center-edge angleX-ray

Identifiers

PMID40862060
PMCPMC12375328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.