ReviewCureus2025
Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd:YAG) Laser-Induced Damage to Intraocular Lenses: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms, Clinical Consequences, and Preventive Strategies.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraocular Lens Modifications for Postoperative Complication Prevention: Advances in Surface Engineering, Drug Delivery, and Photo-Responsive Strategies.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Nd:YAG Capsulotomy Rates of Three FineVision Trifocal Intraocular Lens Platform Across Different Platforms: Results from a Multicenter Clinical Registry Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neodymium-doped:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser capsulotomy is considered the gold standard treatment for visually significant posterior capsule opacification (PCO), which remains the most common long-term complication following cataract surgery. However, Nd:YAG laser treatment carries the risk of inducing intraocular lens (IOL) damage, including pits, cracks, and optical degradation, particularly affecting the quality of premium hydrophobic acrylic and small-aperture IOLs. To systematically review the morphology, material dependence, optical, and clinical consequences, as well as preventive strategies associated with Nd:YAG laser-induced IOL damage. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) databases, including publications from January 1995 to April 2025. Keywords and MeSH terms included "Nd:YAG capsulotomy," "intraocular lens damage," "IOL pits," "posterior capsule opacification," "device-related injuries," and "Yttrium Aluminum Garnet." Peer-reviewed experimental studies, clinical series, case reports, reviews, and guidelines published in English or German were included. Non-peer-reviewed articles, editorials, and conference abstracts were excluded. A total of 53 relevant publications were included following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Morphological alterations ranged from superficial micro-pits to extensive crater formation and delamination, particularly prominent in hydrophobic acrylic and pinhole (small-aperture) IOLs. Experimental studies consistently demonstrated measurable degradation in optical quality, including reduced contrast sensitivity, increased glare, and higher-order aberrations after central pit formation. Clinically, symptomatic IOL damage requiring lens explantation was identified in up to 9.3% of cases analyzed retrospectively. Laboratory analyses, including micro-computed tomography (µCT) and Raman spectroscopy, revealed structural and chemical alterations within damaged areas. Preventive measures proven effective include peripheral laser patterns, posterior offset focusing, minimal effective energy usage (<1.8 mJ), and structured laser alignment techniques. Nd:YAG laser-induced IOL damage significantly depends on material properties, lens design, and laser parameters. Effective preventive strategies, including optimized laser protocols and targeted surgical training, can substantially mitigate these risks. However, robust clinical data linking experimental findings to patient outcomes remain scarce, highlighting the need for large prospective studies in the future, especially focusing on modern premium IOLs. Careful attention seems essential to minimize IOL damage, particularly in premium lens designs, thereby ensuring optimal visual outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.