ArticleCureus2025
Lipoprotein(a) as an Independent Biomarker of Coronary Complexity: Prevalence, Clinical Correlates, and Diagnostic Utility in a North Indian Acute Coronary Syndrome Cohort.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk stacking in peripheral artery disease (PAD): Integrating genetics, cardiometabolic disease and social determinants of health to explain worsening PAD outcomes.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- Lipoprotein(a) as a Predictor of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Lipoprotein(a), Coronary Complexity, and Stent-Related Outcomes: Meta-Analytic Insights for the Interventional Cardiologist.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Despite extensive research on coronary artery disease (CAD), many underlying reasons remain unexplored. Geographic variations warrant focused studies tailored to specific populations. This study was conducted to assess the role of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) in complex CAD among the North Indian cohort with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods This retrospective study included 688 ACS patients confirmed by ECG, cardiac biomarkers, and coronary angiography. They were grouped by Lp(a) levels (≤50 mg/dL and >50 mg/dL) to assess their association with SYNTAX score >22. Multivariate logistic regression evaluated the odds ratio of Lp(a) > 50 mg/dL, and sensitivity and specificity were analysed for different Lp(a) cut-off values. Results In the present study, 207 (30.1%) of participants had elevated Lp(a) levels exceeding 50 mg/dL. Comorbidities and baseline blood parameters were evenly distributed between groups. A SYNTAX score > 22 was observed in 35.7% (n = 74/207) of individuals with Lp(a) > 50 mg/dL, compared to 26.6% (n = 128/481) in those with Lp(a) ≤ 50 mg/dL. On univariate logistic regression, elevated Lp(a) was significantly associated with a high SYNTAX score (OR=1.53; 95% CI:1.08-2.17). This association remained statistically significant after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors (OR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.07-2.21; p = 0.02). Sensitivity and specificity analysis identified the >50 mg/dL threshold as the optimal cut-off, yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 63.37% and 75.14%. Conclusion Lp(a) > 50 mg/dL was significantly associated with complex CAD, independent of traditional cardiovascular risk. This cut-off demonstrated good diagnostic performance, with a sensitivity of 63.37%, specificity of 75.14%, and overall accuracy of 71.91%, supporting its role as an independent biomarker for anatomical CAD complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.