Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40862037›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Optimal Cutoff for the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Tool for Pre-chemotherapy Prognosis Stratification of Breast Cancer Patients.

Armita Zandi, Alyssa Qian, Maha Othman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic factor in metastatic breast cancer.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Armita ZandiDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Alyssa QianDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, CAN.
Maha OthmanDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, CAN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an established inflammatory marker in cancer patients. The optimal cut-off as an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer (BC) progression in patients undergoing chemotherapy remains debatable, hindering effective stratification. This study explored the optimal NLR cut-off by comparing various thresholds and assessing their effectiveness in stratifying BC patients according to prognosis. Methods This was a longitudinal quantitative study conducted at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, and the associated hospital is Kingston General Hospital. Demographic, clinical, and cancer-specific data on 42 BC patients were recorded, including complete blood counts before and after two cycles of chemotherapy. The receiver operating characteristic curve assessed discriminatory performance. Diagnostic metrics and Youden's J index were calculated, and McNemar's test was used to compare baseline NLR cutoffs of 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5. Kaplan-Meier curves assessed the relationship between various NLR cut-offs and other cancer prognostic markers. Results The three NLR cutoffs demonstrated distinct diagnostic metrics and Youden's J index values (p < 0.001), with the 3.0 cutoff providing the most balanced performance. Patients with pre-chemotherapy NLR > 3.0 were predicted to develop advanced stage BC more rapidly compared to those with pre-chemotherapy NLR < 3.0. Conclusion We believe that a more stringent NLR cutoff of 3.0 may be a suitable predictor of prognosis in BC patients based on the ranges evaluated in the literature. Findings of this paper could help clinicians in stratifying BC patients by risk, improving personalized treatment intensity while monitoring strategies accordingly.

Indexed as

biomarkersblood cell countchemotherapyclinical oncologyinflammation

Identifiers

PMID40862037
PMCPMC12371219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.