ArticleCureus2025
Optimal Cutoff for the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Tool for Pre-chemotherapy Prognosis Stratification of Breast Cancer Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and MUST-Defined Nutritional Risk as Independent Correlates of Domain-Specific Quality of Life in Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic factor in metastatic breast cancer.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2026Article
- Baseline inflammatory and metabolic indicators associated with early PD-1 inhibitor resistance in advanced cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an established inflammatory marker in cancer patients. The optimal cut-off as an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer (BC) progression in patients undergoing chemotherapy remains debatable, hindering effective stratification. This study explored the optimal NLR cut-off by comparing various thresholds and assessing their effectiveness in stratifying BC patients according to prognosis. Methods This was a longitudinal quantitative study conducted at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, and the associated hospital is Kingston General Hospital. Demographic, clinical, and cancer-specific data on 42 BC patients were recorded, including complete blood counts before and after two cycles of chemotherapy. The receiver operating characteristic curve assessed discriminatory performance. Diagnostic metrics and Youden's J index were calculated, and McNemar's test was used to compare baseline NLR cutoffs of 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5. Kaplan-Meier curves assessed the relationship between various NLR cut-offs and other cancer prognostic markers. Results The three NLR cutoffs demonstrated distinct diagnostic metrics and Youden's J index values (p < 0.001), with the 3.0 cutoff providing the most balanced performance. Patients with pre-chemotherapy NLR > 3.0 were predicted to develop advanced stage BC more rapidly compared to those with pre-chemotherapy NLR < 3.0. Conclusion We believe that a more stringent NLR cutoff of 3.0 may be a suitable predictor of prognosis in BC patients based on the ranges evaluated in the literature. Findings of this paper could help clinicians in stratifying BC patients by risk, improving personalized treatment intensity while monitoring strategies accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.