ArticleRSC advances2025
Unveiling the catalytic potential of silicomolybdic acid in crafting diverse biologically relevant organic compounds.
Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Silicomolybdic acid (SMA) is a widely explored heteropoly acid with key advantages, including easy recovery, safer handling, and strong acid strength. In this study, we report the first comprehensive application of SMA, a Keggin-type heteropoly acid, as an efficient and reusable Lewis acid catalyst for the synthesis of a range of oxygen- and nitrogen-containing heterocycles. The catalytic performance of SMA was demonstrated in the synthesis of biologically relevant chromene, imidazopyrimidine, xanthene, and benzylidene malononitrile derivatives
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.