Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40861935›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2025

Alternating pulse approach for electrochemical production of struvite as an option for phosphorous recovery from wastewater.

Enrique Rodriguez Nuñez, Guadalupe Aguilar Vázquez, Adrian Sosa, Rufino Nava, Arely Cardenas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Enrique Rodriguez NuñezFaculty of Chemistry, Autonomous University of Queretaro Cerro de las Campanas s/n Queretaro Mexico.
Guadalupe Aguilar VázquezTecnologico Nacional de México/ITS Huatusco C. 25 Ote., Reserva Territorial, Huatusco de Chicuellar Ver Mexico.
Adrian SosaFaculty of Chemistry, Autonomous University of Queretaro Cerro de las Campanas s/n Queretaro Mexico.
Rufino NavaFaculty of Engineering, Autonomous University of Queretaro Cerro de las Campanas s/n Queretaro Mexico.
Arely CardenasSECIHTI-CIQEC Faculty of Chemistry, Autonomous University of Queretaro Cerro de las Campanas s/n Queretaro Mexico arely.cardenas@secihti.mx.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0819-9889

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water pollution is a concern, as sewage water contains phosphates that come from different sources, generating eutrophication in bodies of water. There is also an overexploitation of phosphorous, which has a huge relevance due to its use in agriculture. Traditionally, different physical or chemical treatments have been used to remove pollutants from water, some of which use a sustainable management approach focusing on nutrient recovery, rethinking wastewater treatment as resource recovery. Recent developments have used chemical precipitation as an alternative, by adding different metals to yield a slow-release fertilizer. There is considerable literature on struvite production with magnesium added or obtained by electrochemical methods; the latest methods offer the advantage of providing the magnesium from a sacrificial magnesium electrode in a system with low energy consumption, avoiding the addition of chemicals. Although this may be a good alternative, passivation occurs in the anode, causing loss of efficiency in the system. Considering all these factors, this paper examines the influence of different variables such as the concentration of nutrients, distance between electrodes, current density, and frequency of electrical pulses in the efficiency of the system to remove P-PO

Identifiers

PMID40861935
PMCPMC12376932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.