Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40861913›Full record

ReviewACS measurement science au2025

Raman Spectroscopy for Nitrate Detection in Water: A Review of the Current State of Art.

Lorenzo Luciani, Antonio Nocera, Michela Raimondi, Gianluca Ciattaglia, Susanna Spinsante, Ennio Gambi, Rossana Galassi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS measurement science au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lorenzo LucianiScuola di Scienze e Tecnologie, Divisione di Chimica, Università di Camerino, Camerino 62032, Italy.
Antonio NoceraDipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona 60131, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3983-8268
Michela RaimondiDipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona 60131, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3081-5355
Gianluca CiattagliaDipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona 60131, Italy.
Susanna SpinsanteDipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona 60131, Italy.
Ennio GambiDipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona 60131, Italy.
Rossana GalassiScuola di Scienze e Tecnologie, Divisione di Chimica, Università di Camerino, Camerino 62032, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8025-9615

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The contamination of natural basins by agricultural or industrial activities, and the growing need for potable water due to climate changes accelerate the drive to find versatile, fast, practical, and easy-to-use methods for water analysis. A potentially versatile technique suitable for water analysis is Raman Spectroscopy (RS). Featured by good resolution but low sensitivity, RS detects molecular vibrational modes of an analyte in water. Nitrate is an indicator of chemical and/or biological pollution, it displays Raman active vibrational modes affected by the interaction with other systems in solution, allowing a wide range of applications. Concerning Nitrate analysis in water, a general introduction to the Raman effect and the basic instrumentation were herein discussed. RS is a potential solution to wastewater analysis. This review first reports the theoretical background of the technique and its basic working principles, then, the state-of-the-art scientific contributions related to Nitrate detection are investigated with a particular interest in the instrumental setup and the chemometric techniques employed to improve its sensitivity. In the studies hereby considered, instrumental setup (for example, laser frequency, laser power, acquisition times) and different technical solutions (for example, micro- versus macro-Raman instruments) to increase the technique's sensitivity on Nitrate detection are described. Concisely, the use of deep-UV lasers, optically active Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) or Fiber-Enhanced Raman spectroscopy (FERS) equipment, coupled with instrumental settings, i.e. acquisition time, variable temperature of acquisition, use of special sampling apparatus (cuvettes or immersion probes), or with ion exchange resins for analyte enrichment, have been reported. Remarkably, examples of large data correction of unwanted fluorescence by mathematical processing or chemical quenching were reported too, suggesting solutions for the Raman analysis of wastewaters. Finally, a short digression on Machine Learning (ML) applied to RS is proposed, showing the promising results reported in other fields. Data-driven methods could be a solution to improve the low sensitivity of the RS for Nitrate detection. Hence, an approach of ML methods for the typical RS spectra processing (spike removal, baseline correction, fluorescence curve elimination, instrumental noise correction) was hereby mentioned, suggesting an improvement in the detection capability of Nitrate ion in water.

Indexed as

applied spectroscopyFERSmachine learningnitrate detectionRaman data processingRaman spectroscopySERSwater analysis

Identifiers

PMID40861913
PMCPMC12371589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.