ArticleACS measurement science au2025
3D Printed Transwell Microfluidic Devices for Epithelial Cell Culture with Shear Stress.
Article in ACS measurement science au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PolyJet 3D-printed microfluidic device that integrates hydrodynamic focusing of red blood cells and detection of ATP release.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2026Article
- Collagen Type I as a Biological Barrier Interface in Biomimetic Microfluidic Devices: Properties, Applications, and Challenges.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, we describe how 3D printing can be used to fabricate a microfluidic-based transwell cell culture system with robust fluidic connections for long-term cell culture and recirculating flow. This approach consists of an electrospun collagen scaffold sandwiched between two laser-cut Teflon membranes that match the fluidic design. Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells were cultured on the collagen scaffold to create an epithelial cell monolayer. Introduction of cells into the device was facilitated by a printed reservoir that could be closed after proper cell seeding with minimal effect of the flow profile over the cells. The resulting MDCK cell monolayer was exposed to continuous flow and transport through the cell layer and could be monitored by sampling from the basolateral channel network. COMSOL simulations and flow injection analysis were used to determine the effect of the reservoir geometry on the shear stress that cells experience. A variety of analytical tools were used to assess the effect of flow over the cells in this model. This includes confocal microscopy and potentiometric scanning ion conductance microscopy (to determine morphology and conductance), as well as transendothelial/epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) measurements and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction studies (for gene expression analysis). Finally, a drug transport study with the cell model was carried out using two drugs (caffeine and digoxin) to determine the apparent permeability of high and low permeability drugs, with results being similar to findings from in vivo studies as well as studies where MDCKs have been transfected to form more resistive barriers. This approach holds great promise for the creation of more in vivo-like, flow-based barrier models for transport studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.