ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Ultrasound characteristics of endometrial receptivity in patients with intrauterine adhesion following endometrial polyp surgery and their impact on pregnancy.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of endometrial perfusion by arrival time parametric imaging using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in patients with intrauterine adhesions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study endeavors to investigate the ultrasound characteristics of endometrial receptivity (ER) in patients with intrauterine adhesion (IUA) following endometrial polyp surgery and their impact on pregnancy. Methods: Sixty patients with IUA following endometrial polyp surgery were selected as the observation group. Another 60 healthy women undergoing physical examinations during the same period were selected as the control group. Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound was used to assess ER parameters, including endometrial thickness (ET), pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), endometrial volume (EV), vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI), and vascularization-flow index (VFI). Patients in the observation group underwent hysteroscopic adhesiolysis and were categorized into mild, moderate, and severe adhesion subgroups based on intraoperative findings. Ultrasound parameters were compared among subgroups. After a 2-year follow-up, patients were further divided into pregnant and non-pregnant groups according to outcomes, and their ultrasound parameters were compared. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors influencing pregnancy outcomes. ROC curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value of ultrasound parameters for pregnancy outcomes. Results: The observation group had a thinner ET, smaller EV, VI, FI, and VFI, and higher PI and RI in contrast to the control group ( Conclusion: ER ultrasound parameters have high evaluative value in assessing patients with IUA following endometrial polyp surgery and can effectively predict pregnancy outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.