Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40861870›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in big data2025

Artificial intelligence for surgical outcome prediction in glaucoma: a systematic review.

Zeena Kailani, Lauren Kim, Joshua Bierbrier, Michael Balas, David J Mathew

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in big data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zeena KailaniMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Lauren KimMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Joshua BierbrierQueen's School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Michael BalasDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
David J MathewDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness, and its rising global prevalence has led to a significant increase in glaucoma surgeries. However, predicting postoperative outcomes remains challenging due to the complex interplay of patient factors, surgical techniques, and postoperative care. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool for enhancing predictive accuracy in clinical decision-making. Methods: This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the current evidence on the use of AI to predict surgical outcomes in glaucoma patients. A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus was performed. Studies were included if they applied AI models to glaucoma surgery outcome prediction. Results: Six studies met inclusion criteria, collectively analyzing 4,630 surgeries. A variety of algorithms were applied, including random forests, support vector machines, and neural networks. Overall, AI models consistently outperformed traditional statistical approaches, with the best-performing model achieving an accuracy of 87.5%. Key predictors of outcomes included demographic factors (e.g., age), systemic health indicators (e.g., smoking status and body mass index), and ophthalmic parameters (e.g., baseline intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, mitomycin C use). Discussion: While AI models demonstrated superior performance to traditional statistical approaches, the lack of external validation and standardized surgical success definitions limit their clinical applicability. This review highlights both the promise and the current limitations of artificial intelligence in glaucoma surgery outcome prediction, emphasizing the need for prospective, multicenter studies, publicly available datasets, and standardized evaluation metrics to enhance the generalizability and clinical utility of future models. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024621758, identifier: CRD42024621758.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningglaucomaglaucoma surgerymachine learningoutcome predictionsurgical outcomestrabeculectomy

Identifiers

PMID40861870
PMCPMC12370750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.