ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Real-time augmented feedback for gait training: are gait responses affected by the choice of target parameter?
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tactile Biofeedback That Targets Stance Time Acutely Modulates Propulsion Mechanics in Healthy Gait.Research square · 2026Article
- Fully Screen-Printed Pressure Sensing Insole-From Proof of Concept to Scalable Manufacturing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Augmented visual feedback (AVF) is a promising approach for gait rehabilitation after stroke. However, we still lack crucial knowledge about how to most efficiently use it. Research Question: How does the selection of the gait parameter targeted by the AVF signal influence the global motor response (i.e., overall gait pattern)? Methods: 24 healthy young participants (mean age 25.3 Results: When using ST and POF feedback targets, participants successfully modified their local asymmetry by an average of 10%. Correlation analysis (Spearman) indicated that the modulated gait propagated across parameters, with a fair correlation Significance: Our results show that the efficacy of AVF is dependent on the selected target parameter. This choice also seems to affect how local symmetry changes affect global motion patterns. This work is a first step towards a more comprehensive understanding of the direct and indirect impact of AVF on gait response, which is crucial before using AVF for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.